Meta: Improving Blog Usability With Expandable Post Summaries

I've just implemented expandable post summaries on this blog and the last several posts appearing on the home page. The first section of each post appears on both the home page and the item page, as this paragraph does. The rest of the post is displayed only when you view the item page, which you can reach by following the "Continue reading ..." link at the end of the post's summary content on the main page, or the usual Date/Time "perma-link" below the content of each post.

My motivation is to try to reduce the percentage of folks who leave immediately upon arriving at the home page.

Combining information from the three visit trackers I'm using - SiteMeter, StatCounter, and Google Analytics - I know that most folks arrive here through the home page, which make sense.
But the trackers also show me that it's the only page they visit, and they often leave immediately upon arriving. Google Analytics calls this the "bounce rate"; the other trackers call this "visit length" or "visit depth". Here's how Google Analytics explains it:
Entrance Bounce Rates: Do visitors continue their visit after viewing their first page or do they immediately leave my site? This report lists the top entrance pages on which visitors land and their respective number of Bounces and Bounce Rates.
It's a highly volatile value. For example, the bounce rate for the home page has varied from a low of 32% - damn good - to a high of 88% - pretty poor. It seems to average between 65-70% week-by-week. I want to see if I can get it down to, and keep it under, an average of 65%. At the same time, I'd like to see if I can increase the visit length and/or depth, which I take as a measure of the value folks find in what I'm posting.

I've come up with three hypotheses:
  1. It's not what they were looking for.
  2. They only read the latest content, which is available in its entirety on home page of the blog.
  3. The home page is bloated and overloaded and slow to load, and they don't want to wait.
It's the last case I'm trying to address. Although my sidebar could use some trimming down, and I've got several counters in the footer, most of the size of the page comes from the content. This makes the home page slow to load, and forces lots of scrolling to see all the recent posts. This is especially true for posts that have lots of images, like the recent post about the Sheep & Wool Festival. By trimming down the content displayed on the home page, that page will load faster. It will also allow visitors to see the summaries of each post without having to scroll more than two or three screens, an important web usability design principle.

A side effect occurs for the second case. The various visit trackers can only count when visitors click from page to page within my blog. So when regular readers read all the content of recent posts from the home page, the trackers don't know that they're "staying" on the blog, and record it as a short, single-page, "bounce". In other words, the trackers record this as a "false negative". With the click-throughs from the summary to the full post, the statistics will more accurately reflect how people are using the blog. For you, my regular readers, to click through to the item page, doesn't seem too onerous. Please let me know whether or not that's the case!

It's also possible that this could influence the first case. Most of the references to my blog come through Google, and people searching for all kinds of things come to this blog. But it's not for everyone, and that's okay. There's a possibility, however, that some folks arriving here might find something of value, but don't discover it because they don't see enough of the recent posts, or the poor performance of the page interferes with their ability to assess its content. Either way, improving the performance of the home page would make it more likely that those folks could discover there's something here for them, and stick around to read some more.


Annie in Austin said...

You undoubtedly know that it's me again, Xris! Could this be another possible reason for a fast visit? Someone may have read a post in its entirety, and then just pops in occasionally to see if there are additional comments.

Annie at the Transplantable Rose

Chris Kreussling (Flatbush Gardener) said...

I do the same thing on other blogs, especially if I've left a comment on a post: I want to read the follow-up comments. That's one of the gaps in Blogger: There's no way to get a feed for comments, or subscribe to follow-up comments on a particular post. I wonder if they'll fix that in the Blogger Beta?

I don't think just checking for comment updates gets picked up in the home page bounce rate I'm watching. The comments aren't initially displayed on the home page, only on the post pages. If you click through from the home page to the psot page, that, by definition, isn't a bounce. If you go directly to the post page and nothing else, that counts as a bounce, but only for that page. I'm not concerned about those. If the "entry" page is a post page, I assume the visitor found what they were looking for, so I'm not worried if they don't look at anything else.

Anonymous said...

Xris, yes they have added that to blogger beta. My second blog is beta, and there's a link to subscribe to the comments for each individual post (visible only if you're viewing the comments).

Also, your visitors aren't necessarily leaving immediately. Both Sitemeter and Statcounter will record a visit as 0 seconds if the visitor doesn't view a second page (or refresh the home page) on your site. They could have been there for 10-20 minutes reading every single article on the home page.

Carol Michel said...

I keep some counters, but more out of curiosity than anything else. I do notice that I have a lot more "hits" than comments. I'm working on getting up enough nerve to upgrade to beta blogger...

Chris Kreussling (Flatbush Gardener) said...

"Both Sitemeter and Statcounter will record a visit as 0 seconds if the visitor doesn't view a second page" - Carol

That's what I meant by a "false negative": Someone was reading the blog, but since there was no secondary click, or click-through to another page, the counters can't "see" it. That's included in hypothesis #2.

I've been holding off on coverting to beta until the screams and cries of the damned (ie: complaints from those who converted and wish they could go back) have fallen off a bit. That, and since I rely heavily on direct access to the HTML for my templates and posts, I won't convert until I can edit my posts in HTML.

Anonymous said...

I've got one blog on Blogger and one on Blogger Beta. I screamed and kicked for a while too about Beta, but I think at this point all my complaints have been resolved. So I'm getting ready to convert Janet's Garden to Beta. The only thing really stopping me is having to rework the template and label old posts... beeurk

Sherrykins said...

I found your site through your signature on the forums when you gave me advice about the atom feed. Thank you for that and also thanks for the reminder for doing the expandable posts. I need that very badly on some of my other blogs. That will be one more thing to put on my helpful resources blog, as long as I can figure it out for myself. I'm not very html savvy.
Your site is very interesting, I'll be back for more.

Chris Kreussling (Flatbush Gardener) said...

Sherry: You're welcome! Come back anytime.